Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Cenvat Credit

srinivasan.K kuppuswamy

Sir,

We have purchased MS Angle, Beam , HR Sheets for fabrication of Duct, Sand Mixer and other required inside the factory premises for setting up of Sand Plant for manufacture of castings.

Without duct, sand mixer etc sand plant cannot work.

Central excise department objects cenvat credit on HR sheets, MS Angle, Beam etc.

To run foundry Sand Plant is must and for sand plant sand mixer, duct, elevator is mandatory.

Please give your valuable advice with favorable order on Asseessee.

Kind Regards

K.Srinivasan

Company Challenges CENVAT Credit Denial for Materials in Sand Plant Setup; Cites Supreme Court Precedents for Support A company sought advice on claiming CENVAT credit for materials like MS Angles, Beams, and HR Sheets used in setting up a sand plant necessary for manufacturing castings. The Central Excise Department objected to the credit claim. Respondents cited various judgments, including the Supreme Court's decision in CCE, Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., which supported credit eligibility for items used in capital goods. The discussion highlighted the importance of providing evidence of usage to the department and referenced relevant legal precedents to support the company's position. The forum emphasized sharing knowledge and experiences to resolve such issues. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues