As desired by my dear friend, Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani, Sir, I express my views as under:-
W.e.f. 1.7.12 definitions of classification of services have been omitted. Therefore w.e.f. 1.7.12 ST is to be paid on the basis of service. No classification exists now. For convenience of the assessees accounting codes exist (without legal force) for statistical purpose.The onus is cast on assessee to determine which service he is providing. An assessee is to ascertain the admissibility of abatement and RCM. As per definition of 'Service' under Section 65 B (44) of the Act, there are two parameters for payment of ST. These are:
1. Service must be provided by a person to another person. It means there must two persons involved i.e. Service Provider and Service Receiver.
2. Service is required to be provided for 'Consideration'.
To qualify a service two parameters must be qualified. If even one parameter is missing, it would not amount to 'Service' as per this Section.
Now I come to the present issue.
In this case goods have been transported by road. Nobody can deny this. It means service has been provided to another person. Thus first parameter stands conformed to. Secondly, payment of ₹ 75000/- has been made. Thus service has been provided for a consideration. Second parameter also stands conformed.
In view of the above reasoning, Service Tax is leviable/payable. Whether consignment note has been issued or not, that is relegated into the background. This criteria is applicable for all services not only for GTA. Hence I go with M/s Yagay And Sun,Sirs, Sh.Mukund Thakkar, Sir and ShNaveed S, Sir.