Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 105835
Like 0Bookmark

Valuation for captive consumption duty payment

Date 28 Jun 2013
Replies1 Reply
Views 1525 Views
Valuation for captive consumption adjusted to reflect standard profit margin; amendment designated not retrospective.
Amendment lowered the valuation multiplier for captive consumption to align excise valuation with the ordinary profit margin (taken at ten percent), and the change is not applied retrospectively. (AI Summary)

Rule 8 of Central Exicse Valuation Rules 2000 has been amended vide Notificaiton No. 6/2003 CE (NT) dt.5.8.2003, wherein the words 'one hundred and fifteen percent' has been substituted by the words 'one hundred and ten percent'.   What could be the reason behind this amendment by substitution.  Will it be retrospective, atleast upto 1.4.2003.

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Jul 1, 2013
1.

Normally, the profit is considered @ 10%. Hence, the 110%. it is not retrospective amendment.

Recent Issues