Unjust enrichment: refunds disallowed where credit notes reflect duty passed on at clearance; follow prevailing South Bench precedent. A two Member South Bench held refunds inadmissible where credit notes represented duty passed on at clearance, prevailing over a Single Member Eastern Bench that allowed refunds where credit notes were issued; the Board directs Commissioners to consider filing reference applications and to follow the South Bench decision in similar unjust enrichment cases under section 11B.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Unjust enrichment: refunds disallowed where credit notes reflect duty passed on at clearance; follow prevailing South Bench precedent.
A two Member South Bench held refunds inadmissible where credit notes represented duty passed on at clearance, prevailing over a Single Member Eastern Bench that allowed refunds where credit notes were issued; the Board directs Commissioners to consider filing reference applications and to follow the South Bench decision in similar unjust enrichment cases under section 11B.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.