<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CEGAT Order in the case of CCE, Madras v. Addision &amp; Co., Madras - 1997(20)RLT - 479 (CEGAT-SZB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=5697</link>
    <description>A two Member South Bench held refunds inadmissible where credit notes represented duty passed on at clearance, prevailing over a Single Member Eastern Bench that allowed refunds where credit notes were issued; the Board directs Commissioners to consider filing reference applications and to follow the South Bench decision in similar unjust enrichment cases under section 11B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=259992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CEGAT Order in the case of CCE, Madras v. Addision &amp; Co., Madras - 1997(20)RLT - 479 (CEGAT-SZB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=5697</link>
      <description>A two Member South Bench held refunds inadmissible where credit notes represented duty passed on at clearance, prevailing over a Single Member Eastern Bench that allowed refunds where credit notes were issued; the Board directs Commissioners to consider filing reference applications and to follow the South Bench decision in similar unjust enrichment cases under section 11B.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=5697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>