Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Circulars
of of All Circulars
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Proposal to Challenge Supreme Court Dismissal on SAD under DEPB Scheme; Consider Appeals Instead of Review Petition.</h1> The circular addresses a proposal to file a Review Petition before the Supreme Court against its order dated February 15, 2013, which dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the Department concerning the case involving the Union of India and a company. The Supreme Court's dismissal followed a Gujarat High Court decision that quashed a circular requiring importers to pay Special Additional Duty (SAD) under the DEPB scheme. The Additional Solicitor General advised against filing a Review Petition, as the Supreme Court's in limine dismissal does not constitute a legal precedent. The Board suggests pursuing appeals in similar cases.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
