Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →


Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Government Clarifies: Shipment Mode Won't Affect Drawback on f.o.b. Contracts for Garment Exporters; Cases to Be Resolved.</h1> The Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) has addressed concerns regarding Customs authorities' recovery actions against garment exporters for allegedly claiming excess drawback on f.o.b. values that included air freight costs. AEPC argues that contracts were on a freight collect basis for sea shipment, but due to production constraints, some shipments were airlifted at the exporters' expense without altering the f.o.b. value. The government clarified that if contracts specify f.o.b. terms, the mode of shipment (air or sea) should not affect the drawback calculation. All pending cases should be resolved accordingly, and relevant public and internal notices should be issued.