Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the official liquidator's claim for Rs. 9,901 is barred by limitation under the facts of the case.
Analysis: The Court examined Section 458A of the Companies Act, 1956 which mandates that, for suits or applications in the name or on behalf of a company being wound up, the period from the commencement of the winding-up proceedings to the date of the winding-up order (both inclusive) and a period of one year following the winding-up order are to be excluded when computing limitation. The Court interpreted the provision to mean the aggregate of both periods is to be excluded in computing the period of limitation and rejected the submission that only the one-year period following the winding-up order is to be excluded. Applying these exclusions to the dates before the Court (including the cheque dated 11 September 1974, presentation of the winding-up petition on 10 July 1974, and winding-up order on 8 August 1975), the Court found that when the full excluded period is applied the claim falls within time. The Court also noted procedural requirements that the application, being in substance a plaint, must include particulars establishing timeliness when relying on an extended period of limitation.
Conclusion: The claim is not barred by limitation; decree for Rs. 9,901 will be entered in favour of the official liquidator against the respondent, with costs.