Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an exemption notification issued under the sales tax law, without specifying its commencement date, operated only from the date of its issuance or for the whole financial year in which it was issued.
Analysis: The scheme of the Act treated sales tax as a yearly levy on taxable turnover, while the periodic returns and assessments under the rules were only machinery for collection. Section 6 empowered the Government to declare goods tax-free from time to time, but did not itself fix the point of commencement of an exemption. In the absence of an express date in the notification, and since the tax was structured as an annual tax rather than a series of separate quarterly or monthly levies, an exemption granted during the year attached to the whole year. The separate argument based on estoppel against the Government did not avail against the statute, and the later exemption notification governed the tax liability for the relevant year.
Conclusion: The exemption operated for the entire financial year, and the levy of sales tax on the exempted goods for the period in question was not sustainable; the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a sales tax statute imposes an annual tax on taxable turnover and an exemption notification does not specify a later commencement date, the exemption takes effect for the whole financial year in which it is granted.