Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wheat bran stood exempt from sales tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 from 19 October 1991, and whether the subsequent amendment, entry in the Second Schedule, and departmental clarification could revive tax liability.
Analysis: The Government Order published in the official Gazette was treated as a valid notification under section 8-A(1) because the Act did not prescribe any special form for a notification and publication in the Gazette satisfied the statutory requirement. The later corrigendum was construed as intended to carry out the same exemption policy for wheat bran, and the Court held that the exemption notification remained operative until cancelled under section 8-A(3). No subsequent cancellation notification was issued. The Court further held that the assessing authorities and Commissioner could not challenge the State Government's competence to issue the exemption, and that a beneficial tax exemption must be construed liberally. The Court also rejected the argument that the entry in the Second Schedule or departmental clarification impliedly withdrew the exemption.
Conclusion: Wheat bran was held exempt from tax with effect from 19 October 1991, and the impugned assessments and notices levying tax on that commodity were quashed.