Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Resolution No. 17767 dated 19 October 1979 continued the earlier incentives granted to newly set-up small-scale industrial units up to 30 September 1979 so as to entitle the unit, which commenced production on 22 August 1979, to sales tax exemption, and whether a Government resolution duly published in the Gazette could operate as a valid notification for that purpose.
Analysis: The earlier Government resolution granting incentives to registered small-scale industries provided tax relief in broad terms and contained no cut-off date restricting commencement of production. Resolution No. 17767 expressly referred to the earlier resolution and continued all incentive schemes operative till March 1979 up to 30 September 1979. On that reading, the earlier exemption scheme stood extended without importing any cut-off date. The contention that the resolution was ineffective because it was not a notification in the strict sense was rejected. Under the Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act, 1917, a notification means a notification in the Gazette, and publication in the Gazette of a formal Government resolution issued in the name of the Governor amounted at least to substantial compliance with the statutory requirement. Exemption provisions were also required to receive a liberal construction.
Conclusion: The unit was entitled to sales tax exemption under the extended incentive scheme, and the objection based on the form of the resolution failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order denying exemption could not stand, and the matter required fresh assessment in light of the extended exemption scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: A Government resolution expressly continuing an earlier exemption scheme and published in the Gazette constitutes a valid notification for exemption purposes, and exemption provisions must be construed liberally in favour of the assessee.