Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to exemption from purchase or sales tax under the Industrial Policy Resolution for 1979-83 on the basis of promissory estoppel, and whether the assessment order rejecting that claim was liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The petitioners established that they set up and commenced production of a small-scale oil mill in reliance on the Industrial Policy Resolution, and altered their position on the strength of the State's representation of tax exemption. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was held applicable against the Government where a clear promise is intended to be acted upon and is in fact acted upon. The absence of a separate notification under section 6 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act did not defeat the enforceability of the State's promise in the policy resolution on these facts, and the subsequent refusal to grant the promised exemption was found inconsistent with that representation.
Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to the benefit of the Industrial Policy Resolution and the tax liability was required to be computed on that basis; the assessment order was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A governmental promise of tax exemption contained in an industrial policy, when acted upon and resulting in alteration of position by the promisee, is enforceable against the State by promissory estoppel and cannot be withdrawn inconsistently on the ground of executive freedom where no overriding statutory bar is shown.