Penalty for duty-clearance lapses upheld, but reduced where later regularisation and small-sector status warranted leniency.

Clearance of excisable goods without the required debit entries in the PLA or RG 23A account, together with non-maintenance of the RG-1 register, was treated as a substantive contravention of Rules 9 and 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and not as a merely technical lapse. The later regularisation of duty payment and interest did not remove the earlier breach, so penalty under Rule 173Q was justified. However, the assessee's status as a small-sector technocrat unit and the absence of prior contraventions warranted leniency, and the penalty was substantially reduced.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was warranted for clearance of goods without making the required debit entries and for non-maintenance of the RG-1 register, and if so, whether the penalty should be reduced.

Analysis: Rules 9 and 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 require removal of goods only on payment of duty, and duty payment is reflected by appropriate debit entries in the PLA or RG 23A account. On the facts, two consignments had been cleared without such debit entries, and later entries and payment of interest showed that the duty had been regularised only subsequently. The failure to maintain the RG-1 record was also not satisfactorily explained. These contraventions were therefore not treated as merely technical in nature so as to exclude penalty. At the same time, the assessee was a technocrat unit in the small sector, with no prior contraventions on record, which justified leniency in the quantum of penalty.

Conclusion: Penalty was held to be justified, but the amount was reduced substantially from Rs. 1,05,000 to Rs. 10,000 in favour of the assessee.

---