Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was required to deposit again, in the Calcutta Commissionerate, the duty amount already deposited during investigation with the Jaipur Commissionerate, while the confirmation of duty and penalty remained unchallenged.
Analysis: The amount confirmed in adjudication had already been paid during investigation pursuant to directions of the DRI. The direction to pay the same amount again was made only because of inter-Commissionerate accounting difficulties. Since the money had already been deposited and the adjustment was an internal administrative matter between Customs formations, the assessee could not be burdened with a second payment for the same confirmed demand.
Conclusion: The assessee was under no legal obligation to pay the confirmed amount again in Calcutta.