Procedural defects in appeal filing, including incomplete papers and improper authorisation, led to dismissal as not maintainable.

An appeal before CEGAT was held not maintainable in its presented form where the record showed defective filing, incomplete papers, improper verification and attestation, and want of proper authorisation reflected in the appeal papers. The Tribunal treated the defects as fundamental because the impugned and original orders were not enclosed, the procedural requirements for presentation were not complied with, and no explanation was furnished despite notice. Repeated failure to cure similar defects was also noted. The appeal was dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, and the stay application was disposed of.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal was liable to be dismissed for non-compliance with the procedural requirements governing filing of the appeal and for want of proper authorisation and complete papers.

Analysis: The appeal was filed by the Deputy Commissioner pursuant to authorisation, but the appellant on record remained the Commissioner. The appeal papers were incomplete, the impugned and original orders were not enclosed, verifications were not made at the proper place, and no response was given to the notice calling for explanation. The filing also disclosed irregularities in the manner of attestation and presentation of the appeal. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated the defects as fundamental and noted repeated non-compliance by the Commissionerate with earlier directions to cure similar defects.

Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable in its presented form and was dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The stay application stood disposed of.

---