<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 699 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97597</link>
    <description>An appeal before CEGAT was held not maintainable in its presented form where the record showed defective filing, incomplete papers, improper verification and attestation, and want of proper authorisation reflected in the appeal papers. The Tribunal treated the defects as fundamental because the impugned and original orders were not enclosed, the procedural requirements for presentation were not complied with, and no explanation was furnished despite notice. Repeated failure to cure similar defects was also noted. The appeal was dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 699 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97597</link>
      <description>An appeal before CEGAT was held not maintainable in its presented form where the record showed defective filing, incomplete papers, improper verification and attestation, and want of proper authorisation reflected in the appeal papers. The Tribunal treated the defects as fundamental because the impugned and original orders were not enclosed, the procedural requirements for presentation were not complied with, and no explanation was furnished despite notice. Repeated failure to cure similar defects was also noted. The appeal was dismissed under Rule 11 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>