Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit was admissible on the disputed items as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The disputed items were considered in the light of the settled position that refractory material is entitled to capital goods treatment under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal also noted that the other items, including AC motors, cast air pipes, pinion and rotar air lock valve, formed parts of the kiln used in the manufacturing process, and this factual position was not disputed by the revenue. In view of the Supreme Court's dismissal of the revenue's challenge in Jawahar Mills and the Tribunal's earlier view in Century Cement, no infirmity was found in the order granting credit.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit on the disputed items was held to be admissible as capital goods, and the revenue's appeal was rejected.