Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the claim by Sharada Agencies for expenses (pre- and post-incorporation) is payable in the liquidation of Ambica Textiles Ltd.
Analysis: The claim includes amounts said to have been paid before and after incorporation for formation, registration, and management. Section 103(3) of the Indian Companies Act treats contracts made before a company is entitled to commence business as provisional and not binding until the company attains that entitlement. Under that principle, pre-incorporation expenses and contracts are not enforceable against a company that never became entitled to commence business. The Court examined authority distinguishing statutory liabilities and held that where the statute prevents a binding contract before commencement, no implication of a promise to pay arises under general contract principles.
Conclusion: The claim of Sharada Agencies is dismissed and the claim is deleted from the list of debts and claims.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 103(3) of the Indian Companies Act renders contracts made before a company is entitled to commence business provisional and not binding, thereby precluding recovery of pre-commencement expenses against a company that never became entitled to commence business.