Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a petition for rectification of the share register under section 38 of the Companies Act, 1913 was maintainable when no duly stamped instrument of transfer had been delivered to the company as required by section 34(3) of that Act.
Analysis: The statutory scheme made delivery of a properly executed and duly stamped transfer instrument a prerequisite to any registration of transfer and, consequently, to relief by way of rectification of the register. The absence of a stamped transfer document meant that the company would have acted unlawfully had it registered the transfer. The contention that the omission to stamp the form could be cured through the rectification proceeding was rejected because the proceeding could not be used to compel action contrary to the statute. The requirement under section 34(3) was treated as mandatory and not as a mere irregularity.
Conclusion: The petition for rectification was not maintainable and the appeal succeeded.