Set-off between joint and several obligations permitted where mutuality in right and character exists; set-off allowed.

Where parties assert set-off between a debt owed to one firm-member and a joint and several liability owed by that member as part of a different firm, mutuality is satisfied because a joint promise operates as joint and several and therefore as a several debt of each promisor; consequently a several obligor may set off a debt due to it against the joint and several liability owed by it. The legal reasoning applies partnership and joint-promise principles to permit set-off where the right and character of the parties coincide, and the claim to set off is allowed in favour of the applicant firm.

---

---

Issues: Whether a debt due to one firm (a member of a joint promisor) by a debtor may be set off against a debt due by a different firm consisting of that firm together with another person, i.e., whether set-off is permissible where the liability of the debtors is joint and several.

Analysis: The applicable legal framework requires mutuality of debts or dealings between the same parties and in the same right for set-off to operate. Under the Indian law, a joint promise is treated as joint and several in the absence of contrary agreement (Section 43 of the Indian Contract Act), and partners may incur joint and several liability (Section 25 of the Indian Partnership Act). Where a debt is joint and several it operates as a several debt of each promisor for purposes of set-off, permitting a partner (or firm) to set off a debt due to it by the debtor against a joint and several liability owed by that partner as part of a firm. The rule in illustrative civil procedure provisions concerning mutuality (Order 8 Rule 6, illustrations) does not displace the statutory principle that joint promises are joint and several and thereby affect the availability of set-off in insolvency or winding-up contexts where mutuality in right and character of the parties exists.

Conclusion: Set-off is permissible; the claim to set off the debt is allowed in favour of the applicant (the firm asserting the set-off).

Final Conclusion: The legal effect is that where liabilities are joint and several under the relevant statutes, a party entitled to a debt may exercise set-off against a joint and several liability owed by that party as part of a firm, and the set-off must be given effect.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a promise or partnership liability is joint and several under Indian law, mutuality for set-off exists as to each several obligor and a debt due to one such obligor may be set off against a joint and several liability owed by that obligor.

---