Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the signatories to the memorandum of association were liable to be entered as contributories notwithstanding pleas of fraud, misrepresentation, non-allotment of shares, repudiation of liability, and withdrawal of consent to act as directors.
Analysis: A subscriber to the memorandum becomes bound on incorporation to take the shares entered against his name, and the absence of a formal allotment does not discharge that obligation. Liability as a contributor in winding up is not avoided by alleging fraud or misrepresentation against the promoters, because such pleas may affect inter se rights but do not defeat the statutory obligation to contribute. A surrender of uncalled shares which would reduce capital is not valid unless supported by a recognised statutory basis such as forfeiture. The signatories here were not past members and could not escape liability by their own default in relation to allotment or by asserting that they had ceased to act as directors.
Conclusion: The signatories to the memorandum were liable as contributories and their names were directed to be entered in the list of contributories.
Ratio Decidendi: A subscriber to a company's memorandum remains liable for the shares opposite his name in winding up, and that liability cannot be defeated by non-allotment, alleged fraud by promoters, or an invalid surrender of shares that would amount to an unlawful reduction of capital.