<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (12) TMI 25 - IN THE SIND JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER S COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96631</link>
    <description>A subscriber to a company&#039;s memorandum becomes bound on incorporation to take the shares entered against his name, and liability as a contributory in winding up is not avoided by the absence of formal allotment. Allegations of fraud or misrepresentation by promoters may affect separate rights between the parties, but they do not defeat the statutory obligation to contribute. A purported surrender of uncalled shares is ineffective where it would amount to an unlawful reduction of capital unless supported by a recognised statutory basis such as forfeiture. The signatories who had not been validly released from that obligation remained liable as contributories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (12) TMI 25 - IN THE SIND JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER S COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96631</link>
      <description>A subscriber to a company&#039;s memorandum becomes bound on incorporation to take the shares entered against his name, and liability as a contributory in winding up is not avoided by the absence of formal allotment. Allegations of fraud or misrepresentation by promoters may affect separate rights between the parties, but they do not defeat the statutory obligation to contribute. A purported surrender of uncalled shares is ineffective where it would amount to an unlawful reduction of capital unless supported by a recognised statutory basis such as forfeiture. The signatories who had not been validly released from that obligation remained liable as contributories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>