Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed amendments to the memorandum, including provision for remuneration of the governing body and members' participation in benefits, were alterations "with respect to the objects of the company" within the meaning of section 5(1) of the Companies Act, 1929 and therefore capable of sanction.
Analysis: Section 5(1) permits alteration of memorandum provisions where the change relates to the company's objects and is directed to enabling the business to be carried on more economically or efficiently, or to attain the main purpose by new or improved means. The impugned amendments did not seek to change the association's main purpose of promoting poultry husbandry. They were aimed at removing restrictions that had become impracticable as the association expanded, so that the existing objects could be carried out efficiently through an adequate organisational and remuneration structure. Provisions governing remuneration and distribution of benefits, though not themselves the principal object, were treated as provisions closely connected with the manner in which the objects were to be achieved and therefore falling within the statutory expression.
Conclusion: The proposed alterations were held to be alterations with respect to the objects of the company and were sanctionable under section 5(1) of the Companies Act, 1929; the appeal succeeded.