Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a true construction of section 270 of the Companies Act, 1913, an unregistered company could be wound up only if it consisted of more than seven members at the time the petition for winding up was presented.
Analysis: The statutory language of section 270 was treated as materially corresponding to the English provision governing unregistered companies. The construction adopted in the English authorities was that the jurisdiction to order winding up depended on the company consisting of more than seven members when the petition was presented, not at some earlier or later date. Reading section 270 in that light, the expression "shall include any partnership, association or company consisting of more than seven members" was held to denote a condition precedent to jurisdiction. A broader view, under which a smaller partnership could be wound up merely because it otherwise fell within the section, was rejected as inconsistent with the language and scheme of the Act.
Conclusion: The correct construction of section 270 required the company to consist of more than seven members at the date of presentation of the winding-up petition, and the contrary view was erroneous. The appeal was therefore allowed and the matter remitted for determination on the merits according to law.