Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conveyor belt system fabricated, assembled, tested and commissioned at site had acquired the character of excisable goods or had become immovable property and, therefore, escaped central excise duty.
Analysis: The same issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour in an earlier Tribunal decision on identical facts. The system was found to attain its identity only after the operations necessary to make it workable were completed, and the remaining activity involved only assembling parts into an incomplete system. Such a system could not be transported as a complete conveyor system and would have to be dismantled into parts, indicating that it was not a movable excisable commodity but immovable property.
Conclusion: The conveyor system was not liable to central excise duty as excisable goods, and the appeal by the Revenue failed.