Provisional release of seized excisable goods under a bond-and-security regime remains discretionary; collateral allegations do not control that limited determination.

Rule 206(3) permitted provisional release of seized excisable goods on execution of a bond in the prescribed form with security as the Commissioner considered appropriate, and the amount and nature of security could vary with the facts of each assessee. The limited question was only whether the bond-and-security condition for release was open to interference, so allegations of illegal removal or misrepresentation were not material to that determination and could be examined in confiscation proceedings. The discretionary security requirement was therefore upheld, and the order directing provisional release on bond with security remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the condition requiring execution of a bond and security for provisional release of seized excisable goods under Rule 206(3) was open to interference, and whether objections regarding alleged illegal removal and misrepresentation affected the present proceedings.

Analysis: Rule 206(3) permitted release of seized goods pending adjudication on execution of a bond in the prescribed form with such security as the Commissioner might require. The amount and nature of security were discretionary and could vary with the facts of each assessee. Questions whether the goods had been cleared illegally or whether there had been misrepresentation were not material to the limited issue of provisional release, and such matters could be considered in confiscation proceedings.

Conclusion: The security requirement was within the discretionary framework of the rule, and the appeal did not call for interference.

Final Conclusion: The order directing provisional release on bond with security was left undisturbed and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 206(3), provisional release of seized goods is governed by a discretionary bond-and-security regime, and collateral allegations concerning clearance or misrepresentation do not govern that limited determination.

---