Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of inspection/testing carried out by a third-party agency was includible in the assessable value of the forgings, and whether the matter required reconsideration on the evidence regarding whether such testing was additional and optional.
Analysis: If the third-party testing was merely additional to the testing already undertaken by the manufacturer, the cost of such testing would not form part of the assessable value because the goods would already have become marketable after the manufacturer's own testing. The position would be different where the entire testing ordinarily undertaken by a manufacturer was performed only by the third party. On the facts placed, no supporting evidence was shown to establish that the third-party testing was additional or optional, and that question needed examination.
Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration of the includibility of the inspection charges.