Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inspection and testing charges incurred at the instance of a specific customer and reimbursed by that customer are includible in the assessable value of the excisable goods.
Analysis: The goods were already manufactured, quality-checked by the assessee, and certified under the applicable standards before the disputed DGS & D inspection. The additional inspection was undertaken only at the request of the purchasing department, was optional, and was not a normal feature of sales to other wholesale buyers. The assessee did not derive any extra amount over and above the ordinary wholesale price, and the disputed charges were borne by the customer. On the scheme of Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, assessable value is based on the price ordinarily realised at the time and place of removal, not on customer-specific post-manufacturing expenses unconnected with making the goods marketable in the ordinary wholesale trade.
Conclusion: The customer-specific inspection and testing charges were not includible in the assessable value and the assessee succeeded on this issue.