Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of molasses was to be taken at the wholesale sale price realised by the manufacturers, or whether any additional amount could be added on the basis of alleged State subsidy or a purportedly fixed sale price.
Analysis: There was no evidence that the manufacturers had received any further consideration for the sale of molasses. No statutory order fixing the sale price at the alleged higher rate was produced. In the absence of proof of any extra consideration, the price actually realised on wholesale sale by the manufacturers constituted the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: The duty had been correctly paid on the normal sale price, and no further demand was sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed and the impugned orders were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of proof of any additional consideration or a valid statutory fixation of price, the wholesale sale price realised by the manufacturer is the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.