CHA licence renewal norms validly prescribed, and failure to meet performance standards justified refusal of renewal.

Regulation 12(2)(a) of the Customs House Agents Licence Regulation, 1984 authorised the Commissioner to prescribe renewal norms for a CHA licence, and a public notice issued under that power set the applicable performance thresholds. The licensee's yearly performance fell materially below the prescribed standards for documents cleared, packages handled, and FOB value of goods. Because the norms were validly prescribed and no legal infirmity was shown in their application, refusal to renew the CHA licence was justified and the challenge to the refusal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether refusal to renew the Customs House Agent licence was justified for failure to satisfy the performance norms prescribed by the Commissioner under the applicable regulation.

Analysis: Regulation 12(2)(a) of the Customs House Agents Licence Regulation, 1984 empowered the Commissioner to prescribe norms for renewal of a CHA licence. The Public Notice issued under that power laid down the relevant performance requirements. On the facts recorded, the appellant's yearly performance was materially below the prescribed thresholds in respect of documents cleared, packages handled, and FOB value of goods. In the absence of legal infirmity in the prescription or application of those norms, the refusal to renew the licence could not be interfered with.

Conclusion: The refusal to renew the CHA licence was upheld and the challenge to the impugned order failed.

Final Conclusion: The decision confirms that renewal of a CHA licence may be denied where the licensee does not meet the performance standards validly prescribed by the competent authority.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the competent authority is empowered to prescribe renewal norms for a CHA licence, failure to satisfy those norms furnishes a valid basis to refuse renewal.

---