Modvat credit requires factual nexus with manufacture; precedent must be applied only after comparing material facts.

Modvat credit on low tack protection tape used in manufacturing television cabinets turned on whether the input had a factual nexus with the manufacturing process. When an earlier decision is relied on, the adjudicating authority must first verify that the material facts are comparable before applying its ratio. The lower appellate authority granted credit without undertaking that comparison and mechanically followed the cited precedent, amounting to non-application of mind. The order allowing credit was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration and a speaking order after hearing the party.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on low tack protection tape used in the manufacture of television cabinets, and whether the lower appellate authority could allow the credit by relying on an earlier decision without examining whether the facts of that decision were comparable.

Analysis: Eligibility for Modvat credit depended on the factual nexus between the input and the manufacturing process. Where reliance is placed on an earlier decision, the adjudicating authority must first ascertain whether the material facts are similar and then apply the ratio in the light of those facts. The lower appellate authority did not undertake that exercise and granted relief by mechanically applying the cited precedent. That amounted to non-application of mind, warranting interference.

Conclusion: The order allowing Modvat credit was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration and a speaking order after hearing the party.

---