Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for levy of cess on paper and paper board under the Paper and Paper Board Cess Rules, 1981, the assessable value is to be determined under section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 or by including excise duty in the value.
Analysis: The valuation provision in the Explanation to section 9(1) of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 was held to govern only the ceiling on cess and not the computation of cess under the relevant cess rules. Rule 3 of the Paper and Paper Board Cess Rules, 1981 is in pari materia with the rule considered by the Supreme Court in the automobile cess decision, and it makes the valuation machinery under the Central Excises and Salt Act applicable for levy and collection of cess. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals) correctly applied section 4 valuation.
Conclusion: The cess was rightly levied on the value determined under section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and not on a value enhanced by adding excise duty. The appeal fails.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the cess rules adopt the excise law valuation machinery for levy and collection, cess is to be computed according to section 4 excise valuation and not by resorting to the separate valuation definition in the parent statute's ceiling provision.