Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal on the ground that the dispute was covered by prior Tribunal decisions.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the question of denial of Modvat credit merely because the invoices did not bear pre-printed serial numbers was directly covered by earlier Tribunal decisions in favour of the appellant. The contrary Larger Bench decision cited by the Revenue was treated as laying down only a general rule of statutory interpretation and not as a decision on the specific issue before the Tribunal. On that basis, the appellant was held to have made out a prima facie case for interim protection.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the appellant pending final disposal of the appeal.