Input character determines exemption eligibility even when manufacturing involves an unavoidable intermediate size reduction.

Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-prosecution was allowed where the applicants showed the hearing had been adjourned because the Bench was unavailable and they were actively pursuing connected matters, so their absence did not indicate lack of interest. Exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. was held admissible because the decisive factor was the nature of the original input used in manufacture; wire rods and wires received in the factory exceeded 6 mm, and an intermediate reduction below that size was only a technical necessity that did not defeat the statutory condition. The impugned order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution should be restored; (ii) Whether exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. dated 10-2-1986 was admissible where wire rods exceeding 6 mm were used and the finished winding wire was drawn through an intermediate stage below that dimension.

Issue (i): Whether the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution should be restored.

Analysis: The Applicants showed that the hearing had been adjourned when the Bench was unavailable and that they were actively pursuing connected matters involving the same issue. The absence of attendance could not, on these facts, be treated as lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal.

Conclusion: The application for restoration was allowed and the appeal was restored.

Issue (ii): Whether exemption under Notification No. 69/86-C.E. dated 10-2-1986 was admissible where wire rods exceeding 6 mm were used and the finished winding wire was drawn through an intermediate stage below that dimension.

Analysis: The relevant test was the character of the input material used in manufacture. The wires and rods received in the factory were of more than 6 mm dimension, and reduction below that dimension during the manufacturing process was only a technical necessity. The existence of an intermediate product did not negate the fact that the final product was made from copper bars, rods or wires exceeding 6 mm.

Conclusion: The exemption was admissible and the impugned order was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The proceedings were restored and the assessee succeeded on merits in establishing entitlement to the notification-based exemption.

Ratio Decidendi: For exemption eligibility, the decisive factor is the nature of the original input used in manufacture; an unavoidable intermediate reduction in size during processing does not by itself defeat entitlement where the statutory condition as to the input is otherwise satisfied.

---