Strict construction of exemption notifications barred relief for a reflector used in a bicycle dynamo lamp.

An exemption notification covering only parts and accessories of cycles and cycle rickshaws was held not to extend to a reflector used in a bicycle dynamo lamp. A dynamo was treated as an accessory, not a part, of a cycle, and the cycle was not regarded as incomplete without it; therefore, a component of that accessory could not itself be characterised as a cycle part or accessory. Applying strict construction to exemption clauses, the claim for duty exemption failed and the goods were held ineligible under Notification No. 62/86-C.E.

---

---

Issues: Whether reflector manufactured for use in bicycle dynamo lamps was eligible for exemption as a part or accessory of cycles under Notification No. 62/86-C.E.

Analysis: The exemption covered only parts and accessories of cycles and cycle rickshaws. Earlier authority had held that a dynamo is an accessory of a cycle and not a part of it, and that a cycle is not incomplete without a dynamo. On that basis, a component of the dynamo could not claim the character of a part or accessory of the cycle. The notification did not extend to parts of accessories, and an exemption clause must be construed strictly. The cited decision concerning a part of a cycle tyre was distinguishable because the tyre itself was a part of the cycle.

Conclusion: The reflector was not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 62/86-C.E., and the claim of the assessee failed.

Final Conclusion: The duty exemption was denied, and the revenue's challenge succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification extends only to parts and accessories of a specified article, it cannot be expanded to cover a component of an accessory unless the notification expressly says so, and exemption provisions must be construed strictly.

---