Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cycle beadwire rings, used in the manufacture of cycle tyres, were to be treated as part of a bicycle and therefore outside the scope of duty as urged by the department.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the correct commercial and functional character of the goods. The department treated the beadwire rings as merely an input for tyre manufacture and not a bicycle part, while the respondent maintained that a component of the tyre remained part of the bicycle. The Tribunal accepted the broader view that a part of a cycle tyre could also be regarded as a part of a bicycle, and found that this was the more reasonable construction for classification purposes.
Conclusion: The goods were treated as a part of the bicycle, and the departmental challenge failed.