Additional grounds on Cenvat eligibility can be entertained when they affect tax liability and require fresh factual scrutiny.

The Tribunal held that additional grounds on eligibility under Rule 57D and Notification No. 57/95 could be entertained for the first time in the interests of justice where they may affect correct tax liability. Because those issues had not been examined by the adjudicating authority and the factual basis required fresh scrutiny, the dispute could not be finally decided at the appellate stage. It therefore permitted the new grounds, set aside the adjudication order, and remanded the matter to the jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh decision in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal could entertain new grounds relating to eligibility under Rule 57D and Notification No. 57/95, and whether the matter should be remanded for reconsideration.

Analysis: The arguments based on Rule 57D and Notification No. 57/95 were raised for the first time before the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that such additional grounds could be entertained in the interests of justice, particularly where their consideration may affect the correct tax liability. Since these grounds had not been examined by the adjudicating authority and the factual basis required fresh scrutiny, the dispute could not be finally decided at the appellate stage.

Conclusion: The Tribunal permitted the additional grounds and set aside the adjudication order, remanding the matter to the jurisdictional Commissioner for fresh decision according to law.

---