Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement and steel structurals used for laying the foundation for machinery and the corresponding request for waiver of pre-deposit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were admissible.
Analysis: The materials in dispute were used for civil work in making the foundation on which the machinery was to be erected at an elevated position. On a prima facie view, such cement and steel structurals could not be treated as components or accessories of the machinery or as capital goods themselves. They were construction materials used for the building or foundation and did not answer the requirement of materials used for producing or processing goods. The balance of convenience was, therefore, found to be in favour of the Revenue.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was declined and the applicants were directed to freeze the disputed amount in their RG 23C account without utilisation, with stay against recovery to follow on compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: Materials used only for the civil foundation of machinery are not components or accessories of capital goods within Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.