Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product ALUSIL SOLUTION was correctly classifiable under sub-heading 3809 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.
Analysis: The product was held to be the same as the one already considered in an earlier Tribunal decision involving the same manufacturing process and relevant material, including the HSN tariff notes. That decision rejected classification under sub-heading 34.04 and also did not accept classification under 34.03, and held the product to be excisable and dutiable under sub-heading 3809.00. As the facts and product were identical, the same reasoning was applied.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable only under sub-heading 3809.00, and the assessee's classification claim succeeded.