TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Rules in Favor of Appellants on Import of Specialized Refractory Bricks</h1> <h3>HIND LAMPS LIMITED Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</h3> HIND LAMPS LIMITED Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI - 2000 (116) E.L.T. 259 (Tribunal) Issues:Import of refractory bricks, Benefit of Notifications 242/76-Cus. and 112/87-Cus., Definition of components for industrial furnaces, Special shape or quality requirement for benefit eligibility, Interpretation of previous judgments.Analysis:The judgment dealt with the import of 'Electrocast Refractories with Zirconia' and the denial of benefits under Notifications 242/76-Cus. and 112/87-Cus. The original authority rejected the benefit claim, stating the appellants were users, not manufacturers of furnaces, hence bricks weren't components. The lower appellate authority upheld this decision, noting the standard nature of the bricks. The appellant argued that 'spares' for furnaces are also components, citing a previous Tribunal ruling. They highlighted the unique features of the imported bricks for glass furnaces, emphasizing continuous high-temperature use. The Tribunal found the bricks met the special shape/quality requirement for benefits, overturning the previous decisions.The appellant's advocate emphasized the unique nature of the imported bricks used in glass furnaces, distinct from standard industrial bricks. The Tribunal noted the continuous high-temperature exposure of these bricks, their cost, and quality benefits for extended furnace life and production efficiency. Previous judgments on refractory bricks were referenced, but the Tribunal found them irrelevant to the current case. The respondent reiterated lower authorities' findings but referenced a judgment involving blocks, not bricks, which didn't support their argument. The Tribunal, after considering both sides' arguments, concluded that the benefit under Notifications 242/76-Cus. and 112/87-Cus. applied to the imported refractory bricks due to their use as components in industrial furnaces and their special shape and quality.The Tribunal set aside the original decision, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellants. The advocate highlighted the case's origin as a refund claim, indicating that the matter of refund should be addressed by the original authority as per the Customs Act's provisions. The judgment clarified the definition of components for industrial furnaces, emphasizing the special shape and quality requirement for eligibility under specific notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants based on the unique characteristics and continuous high-temperature use of the imported refractory bricks in glass furnaces.
TaxTMI 