Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the water filter manufactured by the appellants was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 155/86-C.E. dated 1-3-1986.
Analysis: The notification granted nil rate of duty to water filters of capacity not exceeding 40 litres and did not prescribe any minimum capacity or require a separate storage tank or separate candles. The product was an on-line water filter directly fitted on taps, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that such filters were not excluded from the exemption merely because their capacity could not be measured in the manner suggested by the lower authorities.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption was unsustainable and the water filter was entitled to the benefit of the notification.