<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 201 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92521</link>
    <description>The notification granted nil duty to water filters of capacity not exceeding 40 litres and did not require a minimum capacity, separate storage tank, or separate candles. An on-line water filter directly fitted on taps was not excluded from the exemption merely because its capacity could not be measured in the manner suggested by the lower authorities. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the water filter qualified for the benefit of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:32:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 201 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92521</link>
      <description>The notification granted nil duty to water filters of capacity not exceeding 40 litres and did not require a minimum capacity, separate storage tank, or separate candles. An on-line water filter directly fitted on taps was not excluded from the exemption merely because its capacity could not be measured in the manner suggested by the lower authorities. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable, and the water filter qualified for the benefit of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>