Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 14/92 dated 01-03-1992 in respect of PVC compound cleared at nil rate of duty.
Analysis: The exemption had already been held applicable in the assessee's own case. The Tribunal followed its earlier orders, which in turn relied on the principle that availment of credit on inputs does not defeat the exemption where duty is ultimately paid on the resin used in the manufacture of the final product cleared at nil rate of duty.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 14/92, and the demand was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption under the relevant notification remains available where the substantive conditions are met, and prior input credit does not by itself disqualify the assessee when duty is paid in the manner recognised by the Tribunal's earlier binding orders in the same case.