Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme when 50 per cent of the disputed amount was tendered on the last date by cash and cheque, and the cheque was realised a few days later.
Analysis: The petitioner paid part of the disputed amount in cash on the last date and simultaneously tendered a cheque for the balance of the required 50 per cent. The respondent received the cheque and encashed it shortly thereafter. In these circumstances, the respondent could not deny the benefit of the scheme on the ground that the cheque amount was realised after the last date, particularly when the cheque had been accepted as part payment towards the statutory requirement and the petitioner had acted within time.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the benefit under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, and the refusal to extend that benefit was unsustainable.