1999 (8) TMI 292
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ional Central Government Standing Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order].- The petitioner has filed the above writ petition, challenging the impugned proceedings of the respondent herein dated 3-5-1999, declaring that the petitioner is not entitled to avail the benefit under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, on the ground that the petitioner has not paid 50 per cent of the disputed amount on or befor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is no doubt that on 13-3-1999, the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- by cash and gave the cheque for a sum of Rs. 3,36,598/- representing 50 percent of the disputed amount. The respondent, having received the same and also having realised the cheque amount within two days thereafter, it is not open for them now to contend that the petitioner has not paid 50 per cent of the amount within ....
TaxTMI