Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods credit was admissible on the electrical items used in textile machinery and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The items in question were described as electrical components used in textile machinery for manufacture of man-made yarn. Their exact use and function had not been fully explained, but the broad description suggested that they could qualify for credit in the light of the Larger Bench decision in Jawahar Mills. Since detailed substantiation was still required, the matter was directed to be reconsidered by the Commissioner (Appeals) after affording the assessee an opportunity to explain its claim and after taking the Larger Bench decision into account.
Conclusion: Credit was not finally rejected and the appeal succeeded by way of remand for de novo adjudication.