Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed precision balances, having a sensitivity of 0.002 gm., were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 79/90-C.E. dated 20-3-1990 on the basis of the prescribed sensitivity threshold.
Analysis: The sensitivity disclosed in the classification list was 0.002 gm., which was better than 0.005 gm., the equivalent of 5 mg. The balances therefore fell within the sensitivity requirement reflected in the notification. The lower appellate authority had accepted the declared sensitivity and extended the benefit accordingly, and no error was shown in that conclusion.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 79/90-C.E. dated 20-3-1990 was correctly extended to the disputed balances, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The exemption was upheld for the goods in question, and the appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the declared sensitivity of the goods satisfies the threshold prescribed in the exemption notification, the benefit of the notification cannot be denied.