Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ of mandamus could be issued directing return of seized foreign exchange and documents when adjudication proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 had been initiated within the period prescribed for retention.
Analysis: Section 41 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 permits retention of seized documents for up to six months, and beyond that period if proceedings under Section 51 are commenced within the prescribed time. The Court held that the relevant question for retention was whether adjudication proceedings had been initiated, and once such proceedings were commenced, the authorities were entitled to retain the seized material until disposal of those proceedings. In view of the admitted fact that show cause proceedings had already been initiated, the petitioner was not entitled to seek mandatory return of the seized currency and documents by writ.
Conclusion: The writ relief was not available and the request for return of the seized currency and documents failed.