<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 377 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92082</link>
    <description>Section 41 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 permits retention of seized documents for six months, and beyond that period where adjudication proceedings under Section 51 are initiated within time. Once such proceedings have commenced, the authorities may retain the seized foreign exchange and documents until disposal of the adjudication. Because show cause proceedings had already been initiated, mandamus for return of the seized currency and documents was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:09:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 377 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92082</link>
      <description>Section 41 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 permits retention of seized documents for six months, and beyond that period where adjudication proceedings under Section 51 are initiated within time. Once such proceedings have commenced, the authorities may retain the seized foreign exchange and documents until disposal of the adjudication. Because show cause proceedings had already been initiated, mandamus for return of the seized currency and documents was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>