Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether aluminium cast articles manufactured from aluminium waste and scrap cleared at nil rate of duty were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 180/88.
Analysis: The disputed articles were manufactured out of aluminium scrap arising during fabrication of aluminium bodies. The lower authorities denied exemption on the view that the scrap was not duty paid. The governing principle applied was that expressions such as "appropriate duty" or "has already been paid" in an exemption notification cover duty which ought to have been paid, and where the applicable rate is nil, goods cleared without payment of duty are to be treated as duty paid goods. The notification itself also showed aluminium waste and scrap as attracting nil rate of duty, supporting the assessee's claim.
Conclusion: The goods were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 180/88. The issue is decided in favour of the assessee.